Before the off-site, the goals, and the spreadsheets…

HERE IS WHAT TO GATHER FIRST.

September feels like the planning month. October is when the off-sites happen, and the goals get set. November is when the documents get finalized. But the firms that show up to those conversations with the clearest picture, the ones whose plans hold up through Q1 and Q2 instead of being quietly revised in March, started this work in July.

Not because of some best-practice calendar, but because fall planning is not one event. It is a sequence that starts with gathering the intelligence that makes everything else in the process more accurate.

If your firm is heading into a planning cycle in the next 90 days, here is what that intelligence looks like—and how to build it before you walk into the room.

Before you look outward at the market, look inward at the last 12 months. Your firm has been collecting data all year — in your CRM, in your financial reports, in the debrief conversations after wins and losses, in the feedback your project managers hear in the field. Most firms never formally synthesize that data as a planning input. They carry it in their heads and call it experience.

That is not a criticism. It is a gap worth closing before you start setting next year’s targets.

Here is what to pull from your own last 12 months before the planning cycle begins:

Client shifts: Which relationships grew this year and which contracted? Which clients went quiet — and was that budget timing, a relationship gap, or a competitive loss? The pattern tells you where your strongest relationships are versus where the plan assumed they would be.

Fee and margin data: Where did fees hold, and where did they compress? Which project types produced healthy margins and which eroded them? This is the data that tells you whether the work you have been pursuing is worth winning.

BD and marketing engagement: What activity produced conversations, meetings, and shortlist spots? What consumed time and budget without converting? If you ran a conference presence, hosted an event, or launched a content campaign — what did it return? Tracking spend is not the same as understanding ROI.

Market signals from the field: What are your principals hearing from clients about their capital plans, their procurement timelines, their decision criteria? This intelligence rarely makes it into a formal planning document. It should.

This internal data layer is the starting point for any credible planning process. It tells you where the firm stands — not where you hoped it would stand. That distinction matters before you start projecting where it is going.

THE VISIONARY AEC EXECUTIVE: Before the planning off-site, ask your leadership team one question: What does our own data from the last 12 months tell us about where we stand? Not what the plan assumed — what the data shows. That conversation surfaces more useful planning input than most off-site agendas.

Sector Signals: Which markets are genuinely growing in your geography—and at what pace? Not national headlines, but the forward pipeline data in your specific regions. A sector that looks strong nationally may be saturated or lagging in the markets where you work.

Geographic Demand: Where is capital being deployed, and where is it contracting? Construction activity data, permit trends, and economic development announcements tell you where the work will be, not where it was.

Competitive Dynamics: Who is winning the work you want, and why? What has changed in your competitive landscape in the last year? New entrants, firm acquisitions, and PE-backed competitors showing up on shortlists are planning variables worth naming explicitly.

Client Capital Plans: What are your target clients projecting to spend and when? Public agencies publish capital improvement plans. Corporate and institutional clients signal priorities through budget announcements and leadership interviews. That information is available—it is just rarely gathered before the planning cycle begins.

THE STRATEGIC AEC LEADER: Your planning process is only as good as the inputs going into it. If the market data your leadership team is working from is twelve months old, the conversation in the room is based on conditions that have already changed. Gathering current intelligence before the off-site is not extra work — it is the work that makes everything else in the room more valuable.

Most fall planning processes involve the same core decisions:

1. Which sectors to prioritize
2. Which geographies to focus on
3. Which clients to target

These three decisions compound on each other — the sector choice shapes the geographic focus, the geographic focus shapes the client list, and the client list shapes the BD plan. Get any one of them wrong, and the effect ripples through the whole plan. 

Here is how each one breaks down when the intelligence behind it is stale:

Sector prioritization, built on last year’s momentum, assumes the conditions that created that momentum remain in place. Sometimes they are. Sometimes a sector has shifted — federal funding dried up, community opposition slowed the pipeline, or a market that was growing nationally peaked in your geography. Plans built on sector assumptions that have moved create BD investment in markets that can no longer absorb it at the rate the plan expects.

Geographic expansion decisions that are not grounded in current construction activity and competitive data are essentially bets. A region that looks attractive based on general economic indicators may be a market where three PE-backed competitors with deep local relationships have already consolidated the shortlists. That is knowable before the plan is built. It is rarely known.

Client targeting that is not refreshed against current procurement patterns chases relationships in the wrong direction. A client that was a top growth target last year may have moved their capital plans, changed their procurement model, or shifted their priorities in ways that make them a maintenance relationship rather than a growth target. The plan should reflect that.

THE PURSUIT-FOCUSED AEC MARKETER: If your BD team is executing a plan built on sector and client assumptions from the last planning cycle, and the win rate does not match the projection, the first question worth asking is not “are we pursuing hard enough?” It is “was the plan built on current data?” Those are different problems with different solutions.

Your content goes here. Edit or remove this text inline or in the module Content settings. You can also style every aspect of this content in the module Design settings and even apply custom CSS to this text in the module Advanced settings.