The questions AEC firm leaders ask most before their annual planning cycle — answered directly.

Every planning season, I have the same conversations with AEC firm leaders. Not because the same problems keep coming up, though some do, but because planning season surfaces the same questions regardless of firm size, discipline, or market. The stakes feel higher. The timeline feels shorter. And the gap between the plan the firm wants to build and the resources available to build it feels wider than it should.

Here are the four questions I hear most. Full answers to these and six more are on the Fall Planning FAQ page linked at the end of this post.

when should we start planning?

Earlier than you think, and it depends on which cycle you are in.

Fall Planning Cycle

If your firm plans in the fall, the off-site happens in October, goals get set in November, and the document gets finalized before January. That timeline works if the intelligence-gathering phase has already happened. It doesn’t work if intelligence gathering is also happening in Q4. September is a reasonable start for the fall cycle. July is better.

January Planning Cycle

If your firm is entering a January planning cycle, the same principle applies: the firms that go into planning conversations with current market data, a synthesized picture of their own performance from the last 12 months, and a clear view of the competitive landscape make better decisions meaningfully in the room. That preparation takes time, and October is not too early to start gathering it for a January cycle.

Whichever cycle you are in, if you haven’t pulled current market intelligence for your priority sectors, that is not a reason to panic. It is a reason to start this week rather than next month.

Quote graphic on purple background asking whether a firm is treating planning as a Q4 event or as a sequence that starts long before the off-site, from The Flamingo Project's Planning Season FAQ blog

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A BUSINESS PLAN AND A GROWTH PLAN?

Quote graphic on purple background asking AEC leaders which plan they are actually building if their team uses growth plan and business plan interchangeably, from The Flamingo Project's Planning Season FAQ blog

These terms are used interchangeably in AEC, which creates real confusion in the planning process. They are different documents that serve different purposes.

A strategic growth plan answers where the firm is going and how it will get there: which markets, which clients, which capabilities, and what winning looks like over a specific time horizon. It is strategic in nature, should be grounded in current market intelligence, covers the whole firm, and is typically built on top of a strategic plan.

A business plan is the annual operating plan for a region, sector, or profit center. It is a communication tool. It aligns leadership, business development, marketing, operations, and key staff around a shared picture of the market opportunity and shared commitments for the year ahead. It includes market opportunity analysis, business performance review, SWOT, a BD plan, a marketing plan, operations priorities, and revenue targets. It is more operational than a growth plan and more specific to a business unit.

TFP helps firms build both, but they are different engagements with different timelines and different outputs. Knowing which one your firm needs going into planning season shapes the entire conversation.

THE STRATEGIC AEC LEADER: If your leadership team uses “growth plan,” “business plan,” “strategic plan,” and “BD plan” to describe the same document, clarify it before the planning cycle begins. This confusion about what you are building also creates confusion about who needs to be in the room, what the output should look like, and what success looks like when it is done.

WHO SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PLANNING PROCESS?

More people than most firms involve, and in a different way. The instinct is to treat annual planning as a leadership team exercise: principals make the strategic decisions and pass them down. That produces a plan leadership believes in and the rest of the organization executes without full context.

A business plan works best when it includes anyone involved in leadership, pursuing business, managing performance, and ensuring client satisfaction. For a region or sector, that means regional or sector leadership, BD, marketing, project managers, and key staff. Not everyone is in every conversation, but everyone’s perspective is in the plan.

The reason is practical. The people closest to clients and projects carry market intelligence the leadership team often lacks: what principals hear in client conversations, what project managers observe about client satisfaction and repeat-work potential, and what the BD team sees in the competitive landscape. That information belongs in the planning process, not siloed in individual heads

Quote graphic on purple background with orange quotation marks, Sarah Kinard, Head Bird at The Flamingo Project, asking whether a senior project manager could describe the firm's growth priorities without having been in the planning room

THE VISIONARY AEC LEADER: The test for whether your planning process is inclusive enough: could a senior project manager describe your firm’s growth priorities for next year without having been in the planning room? If the answer is no, the plan hasn’t been deployed; it’s been documented. Those are different. 

WHAT CAN TFP REALISTICALLY DELIVER BEFORE JANUARY?

Quote graphic on purple background stating that the honest answer to what TFP can deliver before January depends on one thing, when does the conversation start, from The Flamingo Project's Planning Season FAQ blog

This is the question that comes up most in September and October, and the honest answer depends on when the conversation starts.

Before January, TFP can complete a market research engagement: current sector and geographic intelligence specific to your firm’s growth priorities, delivered as a usable planning input. A business development plan built from that intelligence. Business planning support that works alongside your internal process, adding an intelligence layer without TFP running the whole engagement. A business plan for a region or sector facilitated through TFP’s planning workshop.

What TFP cannot deliver before January is a full strategic plan or a full growth plan. Those engagements require more time than Q4 allows for most firms. Firms that want those deliverables for Q1 execution should start the conversation in September, not October.

For retainer engagements- ongoing market intelligence and strategic advisory through Q1 2027 and beyond; those slots are available for a January start, and the pitch belongs in budget season. That conversation needs to happen before the budget is set.

STILL HAVE QUESTIONS?

We answered 10 of the planning season questions AEC firm leaders ask most, from timing and terminology to who belongs in the process.

EXPLORE THE PLANNING SEASON FAQ

READY TO START PLANNING?

Put some time on Sarah’s calendar to talk through where your firm is, what you need to build, and the smartest place to start.

BOOK TIME WITH SARAH